A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

What are the parameters that define a posthuman knowing subject, her scientific credibility and ethical accountability? Taking the posthumanities as an emergent field of enquiry based on the convergence of posthumanism and post-anthropocentrism, I argue that posthuman knowledge claims go beyond the critiques of the universalist image of ‘Man’ and of human exceptionalism. The conceptual foundation I envisage for the critical posthumanities is a neo-Spinozist monistic ontology that assumes radical immanence, i.e. the primacy of intelligent and self-organizing matter. This implies that the posthuman knowing subject has to be understood as a relational embodied and embedded, affective and accountable entity and not only as a transcendental consciousness. Two related notions emerge from this claim: firstly, the mind-body continuum – i.e. the embrainment of the body and embodiment of the mind – and secondly, the nature-culture continuum – i.e. ‘naturecultural’ and ‘humanimal’ transversal bonding. The article explores these key conceptual and methodological perspectives and discusses the implications of the critical posthumanities for practices in the contemporary ‘research’ university.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-61
JournalTheory, Culture and Society
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • contemporary university
  • critical posthumanities
  • Deleuze
  • posthuman ethics
  • posthumanism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this