A Silk Road for Professional Qualifications? EU Models of Integration and their Potential in Sino–EU Relations

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The tension between the public interest to regulate professions, and the economic rationales to open up markets has long since been an issue within the EU. This has resulted in a variety of regulatory models to accommodate the interests and values at stake. Such models differ in terms of not only their impact on national autonomy, but also their effectiveness in actually achieving access to markets in other EU Member States. In this Chapter, we explore how these competing interests have shaped the EU’s legal frameworks for the recognition of professional qualifications. We will see that a range of regulatory strategies have been applied to design such frameworks. The next element of our analysis is based on the assumption that we may be able to draw lessons from the EU’s internal regulatory strategies to deal with national differences in regulating professions. Thus, we will examine to what extent, and under which circumstances, such regulatory strategies may offer viable perspectives for Sino-EU relations; a crucially important question considering the implications of the New Silk Road for higher education on the trade of goods and services between China and Europe.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationChina and Europe on the New Silk Road: Connecting Universities Across Eurasia
EditorsMarijk van der Wende, William C Kirby, Nian Cai Liu, Simon Marginson
PublisherOxford University Press
Chapter11
Pages203-220
Number of pages18
ISBN (Print)9780198853022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2020

Keywords

  • mutual recognition
  • professional qualifications
  • shared values
  • integration
  • harmonization
  • public/private arrangements
  • mutual trust

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Silk Road for Professional Qualifications? EU Models of Integration and their Potential in Sino–EU Relations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this