TY - JOUR
T1 - A serological divide: men who have sex with men’s attitudes on HIV risk reduction strategies
AU - Den Daas, C.
AU - Adam, P.C.G.
AU - Zuilhof, W.
AU - de Wit, J.B.F.
N1 - cited By 1
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The expanding HIV risk reduction toolkit increases options for men who have sex men (MSM), but increasing options in combination with different preferences may complicate promoting risk reduction. To investigate what strategies MSM prefer, data of 3310 participants in the online survey “Men & Sexuality” (Median age = 37 years, 320 (9.7%) HIV positive) was analysed. Questions assessed attitudes towards HIV risk reduction strategies. Participants had the most positive attitudes regarding PrEP and HIV testing, while withdrawal and strategic positioning were least preferred (all p’s <.001). Condoms were seen as acceptable to partners and effective but scored low on sexual pleasure. HIV-positive participants were more negative about condoms and more positive about viral load sorting than HIV-negative participants (F(12,3297) = 5.09, p <.001, (Formula presented.) =.02). Findings highlight a preference for HIV risk reduction strategies (PrEP and HIV testing) that do not diminish sexual pleasure and can be applied independent of sexual partners. A serological divide was apparent: HIV-negative MSM were less negative about condoms than HIV-positive MSM, suggesting that condom promotion remains a viable strategy for HIV-negative MSM. Taken together, results indicate a need for personalized approaches to the promotion of HIV risk reduction strategies, accounting for individual preferences and strategy effectiveness. © 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
AB - The expanding HIV risk reduction toolkit increases options for men who have sex men (MSM), but increasing options in combination with different preferences may complicate promoting risk reduction. To investigate what strategies MSM prefer, data of 3310 participants in the online survey “Men & Sexuality” (Median age = 37 years, 320 (9.7%) HIV positive) was analysed. Questions assessed attitudes towards HIV risk reduction strategies. Participants had the most positive attitudes regarding PrEP and HIV testing, while withdrawal and strategic positioning were least preferred (all p’s <.001). Condoms were seen as acceptable to partners and effective but scored low on sexual pleasure. HIV-positive participants were more negative about condoms and more positive about viral load sorting than HIV-negative participants (F(12,3297) = 5.09, p <.001, (Formula presented.) =.02). Findings highlight a preference for HIV risk reduction strategies (PrEP and HIV testing) that do not diminish sexual pleasure and can be applied independent of sexual partners. A serological divide was apparent: HIV-negative MSM were less negative about condoms than HIV-positive MSM, suggesting that condom promotion remains a viable strategy for HIV-negative MSM. Taken together, results indicate a need for personalized approaches to the promotion of HIV risk reduction strategies, accounting for individual preferences and strategy effectiveness. © 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
KW - HIV
KW - men who have sex withmen (MSM)
KW - sexual contexts
KW - HIV risk reduction strategies
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85081299200&doi=10.1080%2f09540121.2020.1739213&partnerID=40&md5=0ac18e5f9518d700b3e37829fee74ac2
U2 - 10.1080/09540121.2020.1739213
DO - 10.1080/09540121.2020.1739213
M3 - Article
SN - 0954-0121
VL - 32
SP - 170
EP - 176
JO - AIDS Care - Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV
JF - AIDS Care - Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV
IS - sup2
ER -