A semiotic theory of memory: Between movement and form

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In the multidisciplinary field of memory studies, remembering and forgetting have mainly been analyzed following two ideal-typical models: memory-as-containment (exemplified by the notions of framework and site of memory) and memory-as-flow (epitomized by the notions of afterlife and mnemohistory). These two models are often presented as mutually exclusive and counterposed. Yet, in linking past with present, and when connecting different spaces and generations, memory is always the result of circulation (flow) as well as of local semiotic conditions of production and use (containment). By investigating memory-making and oblivion-making in processes of interpretation, the semiotic perspective elaborated by Umberto Eco allows us to envision memory-as-containment and memory-as-flow in a combined analysis, where the twofold conception of memory – either as movement or as form – merges. The aim of this article is, then, to provide an interpretative theory of memory, and to identify and describe the methodological tools capable of implementing such an approach. The memory of the former Italian concentration camp of Fossoli will serve as an exemplary and illustrative case study.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-119
JournalSemiotica
Volume2021
Issue number241
Early online date2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Umberto Eco
  • epistemology of memory
  • semiotics of memory
  • memory studies
  • Juri Lotman
  • interpretation;

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A semiotic theory of memory: Between movement and form'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this