Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A seed dispersal effectiveness framework across the mutualism–antagonism continuum

  • Casper H. A. Van leeuwen
  • , Nacho Villar
  • , Irene Mendoza sagrera
  • , Andy J. Green
  • , Elisabeth S. Bakker
  • , Merel B. Soons
  • , Mauro Galetti
  • , Patrick A. Jansen
  • , Bart A. Nolet
  • , Luis Santamaría
  • Inst. de Biociências, Depto de Biodiversidade, Univ. Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Rio Claro São Paulo Brazil
  • Doñana Biological Station (EBD‐CSIC) Sevilla Spain
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Group, Wageningen Univ. Wageningen the Netherlands
  • Dept of Biology, Univ. of Miami Coral Gables FL USA
  • Smithsonian Tropical Research Inst. Panamá República de Panamá
  • Dept of Animal Ecology, Netherlands Inst. of Ecology (NIOO‐KNAW) Wageningen the Netherlands
  • Dept of Aquatic Ecology, Netherlands Inst. of Ecology (NIOO‐KNAW) Wageningen the Netherlands
  • Ecology and Biodiversity Group, Inst. of Environmental Biology, Utrecht Univ. Utrecht the Netherlands
  • extern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Many angiosperms rely on vertebrates for seed dispersal via gut passage, an interaction that has been traditionally classified as a mutualism. The seed dispersal effectiveness (SDE) framework provides a mechanistic approach to evaluate evolutionary and ecological characteristics of animal-mediated seed dispersal, by synthesising the quantity and the quality of the dispersal that a plant species receives from each of its animal dispersers. However, the application of the SDE framework has been largely restricted to plant–frugivore interactions, whereas animal-mediated seed dispersal results from plant–disperser interactions that cover a continuum from pure mutualisms to antagonisms. This biases ecological and evolutionary knowledge on plant–disperser interactions. Here, we propose an extended SDE framework (‘eSDE') that allows comparing plant–disperser interactions in the full mutualism–antagonism continuum ranging from pure mutualisms (frugivores) to conditional mutualisms (scatter-hoarding granivores and folivores) and antagonisms (pure granivores). We present the eSDE framework, and use examples to illustrate how it can be applied to compare effectiveness among plant–disperser interaction types. Our initial comparison based on available data suggests that vertebrate species differ more in the number of seeds they deposit away from the mother plant (quantity), than in the effects such dispersal processes have on seed fate (quality). Scatter-hoarding granivores provide the most effective dispersal due to high removal rates, closely followed by frugivores due to high deposition rates. Folivores and pure granivores provide low quantity dispersal, but of high and moderate quality, respectively. These early comparative insights illustrate the necessity and usefulness of more standardized data collection protocols, for which we provide recommendations. Applying the eSDE framework can reveal broad-scale patterns across and within plant–disperser interaction types, which will advance our evolutionary understanding of plant–animal interactions. This will provide new insights into the consequence of anthropogenic impacts on vertebrate-mediated seed dispersal in a world in which plant–animal interactions are increasingly threatened.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere09254
Number of pages13
JournalOikos
Volume2022
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
– This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska‐Curie grant agreements no. 750240 to CL and no. 798269 to IM. Grant PID2020‐115129RJ‐I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 to IM. AJG was funded by project CGL2016‐76067‐P (AEI/FEDER, EU). ESB and LS received funding from the Visiting Professor Fund of the Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences (KNAW).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Oikos published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Society Oikos.

Keywords

  • eSDE framework
  • folivory
  • frugivory
  • granivory
  • plant–animal interaction
  • scatter-hoarding

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A seed dispersal effectiveness framework across the mutualism–antagonism continuum'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this