A punctum scene in Shoah

Rob van Gerwen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Roland Barthes argues that some photos prick the viewer. He calls this punctum. He thinks this is not an effect of the subject-matter, but of some accident in the picture. For instance, a woman’s necklace in an old photograph brings back memories from his own past. The problem with Barthes’ punctum is that it is so personal: who else gets these associations? He does not write about film, though. I do. In films, particularly in documentaries, we sometimes see someone, not an actor, do something that betrays what he is really feeling, irrespective of the things he is talking about. I suggest we call this a punctum scene. In such a scene we experience an element of self-betrayal that pricks us. But such moments of self-betrayal can be seen by everyone capable of empathy. Just watch the film and notice the extraordinary in this person’s movements.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPhilosophy of Film Without Theory
EditorsCraig Fox, Britt Harrison
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Chapter14
Pages205-220
Number of pages25
ISBN (Print)978-3-031-13653-5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Apr 2023

Publication series

NamePalgrave Film Studies and Philosophy

Keywords

  • punctum
  • Roland Barthes
  • Claude Lanzmann
  • Shoah
  • philosophy of film

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A punctum scene in Shoah'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this