A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of osteogenic protein-1 in instrumented posterolateral fusions: report on safety and feasibility

D Delawi, W J A Dhert, L Rillardon, E Gay, D Prestamburgo, C Garcia-Fernandez, E Guerado, N Specchia, J L C Van Susante, N Verschoor, H M E Quarles van Ufford, F C Oner

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical study.

    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of osteogenic protein (OP)-1 in 1-level lumbar spine instrumented posterolateral fusions.

    SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Instrumented posterolateral fusion with the use of autograft is a commonly performed procedure for a variety of spinal disorders. However, harvesting of bone from the iliac crest is associated with complications. A promising alternative for autograft are bone morphogenetic proteins.

    METHODS: As part of a larger prospective, randomized, multicenter study, 36 patients were included, who received a 1-level instrumented posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine. All patients had a degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis with symptoms of neurologic compression. There were 2 treatment arms: OP-1 combined with locally available bone from laminectomy (OP-1 group) or iliac crest autograft (autograft group). The primary outcome was the fusion rate based on a computed tomography scan after 1-year follow-up. The clinical outcome was measured using the Oswestry Disability Index. Additionally, the safety of OP-1 was evaluated by comparing the number and severity of adverse events that occurred between both groups.

    RESULTS: Using strict criteria, fusion rates of 63% were found in the OP-1 group and 67% in the control group (P = 0.95). There was a decrease in Oswestry scores at subsequent postoperative time points compared with preoperative values (P > 0.001). There were no significant differences in the mean Oswestry scores between the study group and control group at any time point (P = 0.56). No product-related adverse events occurred.

    CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that OP-1 combined with locally obtained autograft is a safe and effective alternative for iliac crest autograft in instrumented single-level posterolateral fusions of the lumbar spine. The main advantage of OP-1 is that it avoids morbidity associated with the harvesting of autogenous bone grafts from the iliac crest.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1185-91
    Number of pages7
    JournalSpine
    Volume35
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Keywords

    • Adult
    • Aged
    • Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7
    • Bone Transplantation
    • Feasibility Studies
    • Female
    • Follow-Up Studies
    • Hematoma
    • Humans
    • Ilium
    • Lumbar Vertebrae
    • Male
    • Middle Aged
    • Pilot Projects
    • Prospective Studies
    • Spinal Fusion
    • Spondylolisthesis
    • Transplantation, Autologous
    • Treatment Outcome
    • Comparative Study
    • Journal Article
    • Multicenter Study
    • Randomized Controlled Trial
    • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of osteogenic protein-1 in instrumented posterolateral fusions: report on safety and feasibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this