TY - JOUR
T1 - A New, Practical Animal Welfare Assessment for Dairy Farmers
AU - van Eerdenburg, Frank J C M
AU - Di Giacinto, Alice M
AU - Hulsen, Jan
AU - Snel, Bert
AU - Stegeman, J Arjan
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was financed by the Dutch Ministry of Economic affairs, Agriculture and Innovation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/3/19
Y1 - 2021/3/19
N2 - The Welfare Quality® assessment protocol (WQ) is the most extensive way to measure animal welfare. This study was set up to determine if resource-based welfare indicators, that are easier and faster to measure, could replace the more time consuming, animal-based measurements of the WQ. The WQ was applied on 60 dairy farms in the Netherlands, with good, moderate and poor welfare. The WQ protocol classified most farms (87%) as 'acceptable'. Several of the animal-based measures of WQ correlated well with measures in the environment. Using these correlations, an alternative welfare assessment protocol (new Welfare Monitor) was designed, which takes approximately 1.5 h for a farm with 100 dairy cows. Because the opinion of farmers about welfare assessment is important if one wants to improve conditions for the cows at a farm, another objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the new Welfare Monitor for the farmer. Over two years, the farms were visited, and advice was given to improve the conditions at the farm. After the first welfare assessment and advice, farmers improved the conditions for their cows substantially. Farms where the category score had increased made more improvements on average than those that did not upgrade.
AB - The Welfare Quality® assessment protocol (WQ) is the most extensive way to measure animal welfare. This study was set up to determine if resource-based welfare indicators, that are easier and faster to measure, could replace the more time consuming, animal-based measurements of the WQ. The WQ was applied on 60 dairy farms in the Netherlands, with good, moderate and poor welfare. The WQ protocol classified most farms (87%) as 'acceptable'. Several of the animal-based measures of WQ correlated well with measures in the environment. Using these correlations, an alternative welfare assessment protocol (new Welfare Monitor) was designed, which takes approximately 1.5 h for a farm with 100 dairy cows. Because the opinion of farmers about welfare assessment is important if one wants to improve conditions for the cows at a farm, another objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the new Welfare Monitor for the farmer. Over two years, the farms were visited, and advice was given to improve the conditions at the farm. After the first welfare assessment and advice, farmers improved the conditions for their cows substantially. Farms where the category score had increased made more improvements on average than those that did not upgrade.
KW - Animal welfare
KW - Dairy cattle
KW - Economic return
KW - Integument alterations
KW - Welfare Quality®, water supply
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102698131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ani11030881
DO - 10.3390/ani11030881
M3 - Article
C2 - 33808871
SN - 2076-2615
VL - 11
SP - 1
EP - 21
JO - Animals
JF - Animals
IS - 3
M1 - 881
ER -