Abstract
Objective: The overall effectiveness of interventions for youth externalizing behavior problems was studied using a review and a meta-analysis of published single-case research in children and adolescents. Method: Scientific databases and gray literature were searched for quantitative single-case studies concerned with the treatment of externalizing behavior problems in children and adolescents. Study and case characteristics were extracted, and the studies were rated for quality. Raw graph data from individual cases were aggregated and analyzed by means of multilevel meta-analysis for single-case research. Results: We identified 78 studies including 270 cases (mean age = 8.70 years; 71.48% male individuals). Overall, positive within-person changes during the treatment as opposed to baseline were observed. Reductions in symptoms did not carry through the follow-up phase. However, variations in treatment effects were observed, with larger variations among studies than among cases. Furthermore, studies using observational assessment methods yielded stronger results than studies using questionnaires to assess outcomes. Although the scores for the external validity of the studies were above average, the scores for internal validity were below average. Conclusion: Although part of the internal validity result can be attributed to underreporting certain quality standards in the studies, it is of great importance for the field of single-case research to start implementing existing methodological guidelines and to comprehensively report case-relevant information. This will, in addition, facilitate our understanding of the variability in treatment outcomes for specific children, and will enable us to learn more about the effects of interventions in diverse youth populations. Plain language summary: Single-case studies of youth with externalizing behaviors allow consideration of treatment effects within individuals over time, but meta-analyses of this research have been limited. This study aggregated and summarized the results from 78 published studies of 270 single-case research in the area of youth externalizing problems. Overall, positive changes in externalizing problems were found, and the studies that used observational methods to depict externalizing behaviors reported more changes than studies that used questionnaire methods. Results suggest the quality of single-case studies can be improved. Study registration information: Preregistration Meta-analysis of Single-Case Research on Interventions for Externalizing Behavioral Problems in Children and Adolescents; https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/4bewa
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 220-231 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | JAACAP Open |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 The Author(s)
Funding
The authors thank the postgraduate students who assisted in the collection of the data. The authors have reported no funding for this work. Disclosure: Marija Maric has received a €50.000 Research Stimulation grant from the University of Amsterdam. This funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study, preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Shawn I. Kok, Laura M. Fetz, Yvonne A.J. Stikkelbroek, Patty Leijten, and Janneke Staaks have reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.
Keywords
- children and adolescents
- externalizing problem behaviors
- meta-analysis
- single-case designs
- treatment effectiveness
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research on Interventions for Externalizing Behavior Problems in Children and Adolescents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver