A multi-model assessment of the co-benefits of climate mitigation for global air quality

Shilpa Rao, Zbigniew Klimont, Joana Leitao, Keywan Riahi, Rita van Dingenen, Lara Aleluia Reis, Katherine Calvin, Frank Dentener, Laurent Drouet, Shinichiro Fujimori, Mathijs Harmsen, Gunnar Luderer, Chris Heyes, Jessica Strefler, Massimo Tavoni, Detlef P. van Vuuren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We present a model comparison study that combines multiple integrated assessment models with a reduced-form global air quality model to assess the potential co-benefits of global climate mitigation policies in relation to the World Health Organization (WHO) goals on air quality and health. We include in our assessment, a range of alternative assumptions on the implementation of current and planned pollution control policies. The resulting air pollution emission ranges significantly extend those in the Representative Concentration Pathways. Climate mitigation policies complement current efforts on air pollution control through technology and fuel transformations in the energy system. A combination of stringent policies on air pollution control and climate change mitigation results in 40% of the global population exposed to PM levels below the WHO air quality guideline; with the largest improvements estimated for India, China, and Middle East. Our results stress the importance of integrated multisector policy approaches to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.
Original languageEnglish
Article number124013
JournalEnvironmental Research Letters
Volume11
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

Keywords

  • air pollution
  • co-benefits
  • scenarios

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A multi-model assessment of the co-benefits of climate mitigation for global air quality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this