A 'farewell to literature' in 1860? The problem of literariness in the work of Multatuli (1820-1887)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademic

Abstract

Today, Multatuli (1820-1887) is considered as one of the most important Dutch
writers. His stance towards literature, however, was highly ambivalent. At the one
hand, he realised that writing fiction was the best way to gain personal and
political attention. At the same time, he highly mistrusted the instrument of
(sentimental) fiction to engage readers. The same ambivalence dominates his
presentation as a writer: Multatuli mythologized himself, but he also argued for a
sincere, ‘authentic’ writership. In my presentation, I want to analyze these seemly
contradictory ideas about fictionalizing the world and the self. Some concepts in
literary sociology, such as ‘posture’ (Jérôme Meizoz) or ‘the double life of
writers’ (Bernard Lahire) help to understand the logic of Multatuli’s ideas about
fiction.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCurrent Issues in European Cultural Studies
Subtitle of host publicationJune 15–17, Norrköping, Sweden 2011
EditorsM. Frederiksson
Place of PublicationLinköping
PublisherLinköping University Electronic Press
Pages467-473
Number of pages7
ISBN (Print)978-91-7519-993-1
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2011

Publication series

NameLinköping Electronic Conference Proceedings
Volume62
ISSN (Print)1650-3686
ISSN (Electronic)1650-3740

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A 'farewell to literature' in 1860? The problem of literariness in the work of Multatuli (1820-1887)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this