A cross-sectional study on feather cover damage in Canadian laying hens in non-cage housing systems

  • Caitlin Decina
  • , Olaf Berke
  • , Nienke van Staaveren
  • , Christine F Baes
  • , Tina M Widowski
  • , Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background

Feather damage (FD) resulting from feather pecking remains a concern in non-cage housing systems for laying hens worldwide. This study aimed to identify bird-, housing-, and management-related factors associated with FD in non-cage housing systems as the egg production sector phases out the conventional cage system in Canada. A survey on housing and management practices was developed and distributed to 122 laying hen farms where 39 respondents provided information on non-cage flocks. Farmers visually assessed 50 birds throughout the barn for FD using a 0–2 scoring scale according to severity. Prevalence of FD was calculated as the percentage of birds with any form of FD (score > 0). Multivariable linear regression modeling was used to identify factors associated with FD prevalence.


Results

Six variables were included in the final model and accounted for 64% of the variation in FD between farms. FD prevalence was higher with increasing flock age (0.9% ± 0.29) and when birds were housed in all wire/slatted barns compared with all litter barns (37.6% ± 13.1). Additionally, FD prevalence tended to be higher in barns with manure removal only after depopulation (20.1% ± 10.70). Enrichment also tended to be associated with higher FD (19.1% ± 8.04), possibly indicating that it was provided after FD was observed as a control measure, or, was not efficient in reducing the development of FD.


Conclusions

These findings emphasize the role of litter provision and management (e.g., manure removal effects on air quality), and its potential impact on FD among laying hens in non-cage housing systems in Canada. Further longitudinal and/or intervention studies are needed to assess the potential of the identified factors to function as a management strategy to prevent or reduce FD in non-cage housed laying hens.

Original languageEnglish
Article number435
JournalBMC Veterinary Research
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Dec 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Animal Husbandry/methods
  • Animal Welfare
  • Animals
  • Canada
  • Chickens/injuries
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Feathers/injuries
  • Female
  • Housing, Animal
  • Oviposition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A cross-sectional study on feather cover damage in Canadian laying hens in non-cage housing systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this