A cross-country investigation of user connection patterns in online social networks

Christine Bauer, Markus Schedl

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperAcademic

Abstract

Given the global expansion, the borderless nature, and the social impact of social media, this paper provides an examination of users’ connection patterns in online social networks, more specifically the users’ cross-country connection patterns. We study three highly different social media platforms, Facebook, Last.fm, and 500px, and approach two main research questions: First, we set out to answer which countries’ social media users are mainly connected with users within their own country; and which countries are characterized by a wide spectrum of cross-country (transnational) user connections. In doing so, we also identify the “attractor” countries, being characterized by alluring a large portion of users from other countries to connect to users in the respective attractor country. Second, we compare the results between the three social media platforms under investigation and analyze and discuss differences in the cross-country connection patterns. Third, we investigate whether countries’ attractor values are correlated with cultural features (according to Hofstede). Our results contribute to understanding the complex social ties between people and how they are reflected in connection behavior on social media.
Original languageEnglish
Pages2166-2175
Number of pages10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Event52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - Maui, United States
Duration: 8 Jan 2019 → …

Conference

Conference52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Abbreviated titleHICSS 2019
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityMaui
Period8/01/19 → …

Keywords

  • attractor countries; cross-country connections; overcome coldstart problem; user connections;

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A cross-country investigation of user connection patterns in online social networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this