A compatibility-based procedure designed to generate potential sanitation system alternatives

Max Maurer*, Ahmed Bufardi, Elizabeth Tilley, Christian Zurbrügg, Bernhard Truffer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Regarding multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), the problem of generating alternatives has not received the attention it deserves. Most research is currently devoted to the problem of alternative selection, where it is assumed that a set of appropriate alternatives is already given. This paper addresses the generation of potential alternatives in the domain of sanitation systems planning and decision-making. A compatibility assessment procedure is proposed to determine the set of technically feasible or potential sanitation system alternatives. This is based on a clear definition of such an alternative containing sub-processes that include a user interface, storage, conveyance treatment and reuse/disposal. A newly developed compatibility matrix is applied to identify incompatibilities between the options of the sub-processes. A potential sanitation system alternative is therefore defined by the absence of two-by-two incompatibility between all its options. The compatibility assessment acts as a first filter on the set of sanitation system alternatives to eliminate those that are inoperable before the feasibility assessment. The objective of both steps is to obtain a set of alternatives that are of reasonable and manageable size from which the final solution may be selected.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-61
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume104
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Aug 2012

Keywords

  • Alternative generation
  • Compatibility matrix
  • MCDA
  • Multi-criteria decision analysis
  • Sanitation system

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A compatibility-based procedure designed to generate potential sanitation system alternatives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this