A comparative cost and qualitative analysis for the transportation of green energy carriers

Tom Kroon*, Amir Fattahi, Francesco Dalla Longa, J. Chris Slootweg, Bob van der Zwaan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Green energy carriers play a pivotal role in the transition towards the pervasive use of variable renewable electricity, as they allow for efficient storage, transportation, and utilization of excess electricity generated in specific regions and/or over different time frames. In this paper, we analyze the cost-optimality of transporting eight liquid or gaseous green energy carriers, including H2, via pipelines and shipping, over distances from 250 to 3000 km. To provide a more comprehensive deployability evaluation beyond purely cost-based criteria, we introduce several novel concepts that allow comparing green energy carriers on the basis of safety, applicability, and end-use characteristics. Our study reveals that H2 exhibits significantly higher costs compared to other energy carriers across both transportation modes. For a pipeline and shipping distance of 250 km, we calculate H2 transportation costs of 1.4 and 8.1 m€ per PJ, respectively, while for alternative carriers costs range from 0.1 to 0.7 and 0.2 to 3.1 m€ per PJ. For a distance of 3000 km, H2 transportation costs through pipeline and shipping are estimated at 18.6 and 10.3 m€ per PJ, respectively, whereas for alternative carriers the cost ranges from 1.2 to 7.6 and 0.3 to 4.0 m€ per PJ. An integration of additional selection criteria, however, implies that the practical deployability differs significantly across different green energy carriers, and that no one-to-one relationship exists between deployability and transportation costs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1773-1785
JournalSustainable Energy and Fuels
Volume9
Issue number7
Early online date26 Feb 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Apr 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Funding

A. F., F. D. L. and B. v. d. Z. thank the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy of the Netherlands for its continued financial support of research on the international dimensions of the energy transition and climate change mitigation, and the energy security dimensions thereof in particular. The views expressed in this paper are exclusively those of the authors.

FundersFunder number
Ministerie van Economische Zaken en Klimaat
F. D. L. and B. v.
Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy of the Netherlands

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative cost and qualitative analysis for the transportation of green energy carriers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this