A Classification System for Teachers’ Motivational Behaviours Recommended in Self-Determination Theory Interventions.

  • Asghar Ahmadi
  • , Michael Noetel
  • , Philip David Parker
  • , Richard O. Ryan
  • , Nikos Ntoumanis
  • , Johnmarshall Reeve
  • , Mark Beauchamp
  • , Theresa Dicke
  • , Alexander Yeung
  • , Malek Ahmadi
  • , Kimberley Bartolomew
  • , Thomas K.F. Chiu
  • , Thomas Curran
  • , Gokce Erturan
  • , Barbara Flunger
  • , Christina Frederick
  • , John Mark Froiland
  • , David González-Cutre
  • , Leen Haerens
  • , Lucas Matias Jeno
  • Andre Koka, Jody Langdon, Rhiannon Lee White, David Litalien, David Lubans, John Mahoney, Ma. Jenina N. Nalipay, Erika Patall, Dana Perlman, Eleanor Quested, Sacha Schneider, Martin Standage, Kim Stroet, Damian Tessier, Cecilie Thogersen-Ntoumani, Henry Tilga, Diego Vasconcellos, Chris Lonsdale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Teachers’ behavior is a key factor that influences students’ motivation. Many theoretical models have tried to explain this influence, with one of the most thoroughly researched being self-determination theory (SDT). We used a Delphi method to create a classification of teacher behaviors consistent with SDT. This is useful because SDT-based interventions have been widely used to improve educational outcomes. However, these interventions contain many components. Reliably classifying and labeling those components is essential for implementation, reproducibility, and evidence synthesis.We used an international expert panel (N = 34) to develop this classification system. We started by identifying behaviors from existing literature, then refined labels, descriptions, and examples using the Delphi panel’s input. Next, the panel of experts iteratively rated the relevance of each behavior to SDT, the psychological need that each behavior influenced, and its likely effect on motivation. To create a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive list of behaviors, experts nominated overlapping behaviors that were redundant, and suggested new ones missing from the classification. After three rounds, the expert panel agreed upon 57 teacher motivational behaviors (TMBs) that were consistent with SDT. For most behaviors (77%), experts reached consensus on both the most relevant psychological need and influence on motivation. Our classification system provides a comprehensive list of TMBs and consistent terminology in how those behaviors are labeled. Researchers and practitioners designing interventions could use these behaviors to design interventions, to reproduce interventions, to assess whether these behaviors moderate intervention effects, and could focus new research on areas where experts disagreed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1158 – 1176
JournalJournal of Educational Psychology
Volume115
Issue number8
Early online date2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Psychological Association

Funding

John Mark Froiland is now at Paul’s Plan Ministries, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States. Asghar Ahmadi was funded by the Australian Research Council (DP160102625). The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Nikos Ntoumanis is a consulting editor for the Journal of Educational Psychology. The questionnaire and methodology for this study were approved by the Human Research Ethics committee of the Australian Catholic University (Approval No. 2020-160E). The study materials, data, and code of this study are available at https://osf.io/apvyf/

FundersFunder number
Australian Research CouncilDP160102625
Australian Catholic University2020-160E

    Keywords

    • behavior change techniques
    • behavior changetechniques
    • engagement
    • intervention design
    • taxonomy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Classification System for Teachers’ Motivational Behaviours Recommended in Self-Determination Theory Interventions.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this