A Bridge Over Troubled Water: How Worldview Helps Overcome the Religious-Secular Divide in Development Cooperation and Beyond

Yannicke Goris, Simon Polinder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

Abstract

As research has shown, collaboration between religious and non-religious actors in the context of international development is often difficult and limited. Though various barriers exist, mutual misunderstanding and prejudices appear to be the main reason for the religious-secular divide. This essay argues that this divide—both within the development sector and beyond—can be bridged more effectively by understanding religion in terms of “worldview.” As everyone holds a certain worldview, this concept challenges the current dichotomy and creates a more level playing field as starting point for dialogue. Problematic for the development sector, however, is the widespread equation of secularity with neutrality, and of neutrality with professionalism. The “professional identity” concept can help uncouple this connection.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)116-122
Number of pages7
JournalReview of Faith and International Affairs
Volume22
Issue number1
Early online date11 Sept 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Funding

FundersFunder number
A special word of thanks to Martha Kapazoglou for her contributions to this article. And also to Ninja Lacey, former colleague at The Broker, and part of the research team for the project "Working with Faith-based Actors for Development."

    Keywords

    • International development cooperation
    • dialogue
    • equality
    • professional identity
    • religion
    • secular-religious collaboration
    • worldview

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Bridge Over Troubled Water: How Worldview Helps Overcome the Religious-Secular Divide in Development Cooperation and Beyond'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this